Calls Grow to Ban Chris Brown’s Johannesburg Concerts Over History of Violence

US R&B star Chris Brown’s upcoming concert in Johannesburg is sparking outrage, with activists urging the South African government to deny him entry due to his history of violent behavior, especially against women.

This public debate reflects broader concerns over South Africa’s policies on gender-based violence (GBV) and its approach to approving visas for international figures with controversial pasts.

Brown, a prominent R&B artist, gained fame through his distinct voice and dancing skills, but his career has often been overshadowed by legal troubles.

In 2009, he was convicted of assaulting then-girlfriend Rihanna, an incident that brought global condemnation. Following this, he faced several other accusations, including a 2014 assault conviction and a 2017 restraining order filed by ex-girlfriend Karrueche Tran, who accused him of threats and harassment. Due to these incidents, countries like Australia, the UK, and New Zealand have previously denied him entry.

Despite his controversial history, Brown remains popular in South Africa, with his Johannesburg shows on December 14 and 15 selling out quickly.

However, critics, including local advocacy groups and political figures, argue that allowing him to perform sends the wrong message in a country grappling with high rates of GBV.

Advocacy group Women for Change launched a petition, #MuteChrisBrown, on October 2, calling on authorities to cancel Brown’s concerts. As of now, the petition has nearly 50,000 signatures.

Brett Herron, secretary-general of The Good Party, also sent a formal letter to Home Affairs Minister Leon Schreiber, requesting that Brown be declared an “undesirable person” under South Africa’s Immigration Act, citing his violent history. Herron argued that allowing Brown to perform in South Africa contradicts the government’s commitment to tackling GBV.

South African immigration law grants the Home Affairs Minister the authority to label a foreigner “undesirable” if their presence is deemed harmful to national interests or if they have criminal convictions. A declaration of undesirability could prevent Brown from entering South Africa for the concerts.

Sabrina Walter, founder of Women for Change, emphasized the importance of standing against GBV by not allowing public figures with records of violence against women to enter the country. She expressed disappointment with the Department of Home Affairs for approving Brown’s visa, describing it as a “failure” to uphold justice for survivors of abuse.

While critics push for a ban, Brown’s fans are rallying in support. A counter-petition from fans, known as “Team Breezy,” argues that his art should be separated from his past actions, and that his music can serve as a unifying force. This petition has gained nearly 20,000 signatures, with supporters insisting that his music has a positive impact on audiences.

Journalist Fred Khumalo joined the debate, suggesting that audiences should be able to appreciate Brown’s music while also condemning his actions. He argues that it’s possible to separate the artist from his art, allowing people to enjoy his performances without condoning his behavior.

The controversy surrounding Brown’s concerts comes amid a national crisis of GBV in South Africa. Recent statistics reveal that nearly 1,900 women and over 500 children were murdered in the first half of 2024 alone, underscoring the urgent need for stronger measures to combat violence against women and children.

Sabrina Walter noted that Women for Change continues to honor the memories of femicide victims and stands against celebrating public figures associated with GBV, whether they are South African or international.

In response, the Department of Home Affairs has reiterated that its visa decisions adhere strictly to legal guidelines. Minister Schreiber clarified in an interview with SABC that the department processes entry permits based on immigration law and does not involve itself in invitations to international performers.

Brown’s shows also raise questions about perceived double standards. Last year, he was praised in South Africa for gifting musician Naledi Aphiwe with R50,000 and an iPhone for her contribution to his album. Additionally, South African artist Tyla recently joined Brown on his European tour, which saw little opposition. However, with his Johannesburg concerts approaching, concerns are now mounting about the impact of his visit on the country’s commitment to tackling GBV.

The ongoing debate underscores South Africa’s struggle to balance cultural expression and accountability. Some supporters view Brown’s music as a cultural gift, while critics see his concerts as incompatible with the fight for justice for GBV survivors. Among prominent supporters attending his concerts is former University of Cape Town vice-chancellor, Professor Mamokgethi Phakeng, adding to the division in public opinion.